we know now that in the early years of the twenty-first century this world was being watched closely by socialists browner than we real americans and far less moral than our own. terrorists lusty, stoned and sociopathic, regarded the land of the free and the suburbs of the brave with envious eyes and slowly and surely drew their plans against us. in the twentieth year of the twenty-first century came the great awakening.
it was near the end of may. stocks were better. the covid scare was over. more men were back at work. cities were re-opening. on this particular evening, may 31, internet world stats estimated that 4.65 billion people were cruising the internet ...
donald j. trump @realDonaldTrump, may 31
the united states of america will be designating ANTIFA as a terrorist organization.
anonymous, may 31
i am not one to spread false information, i have been informed by numerous realizable resources. the protest planned for tonight at 8:30 in downtown klamath falls, IS GOING TO BE DANGEROUS. there are two buses heading this way from portland, full of ANTIFA members and loaded with bricks. their intentions are to come to klamath falls, destroy it, and murder police officers. there have been rumors of the ANTIFA going into residential areas to 'fuck up the white hoods'.
do not get me wrong. i am all for peaceful protesting. infact i was going to attend the protest tonight believing it was going to be peaceful.
the real 3%ers idaho, may 31
ATTN ada county BUSINESS OWNERS in boise and surrounding areas:
we have credible intel tonight that antifa and other groups are planning a riot tonight in the boise area. their plan is to destroy private property in the city and continue to residential areas. we are calling on all business owners to contact us if you are concerned for your business and your private property immediately. we are here to protect you, your private business, and have teams on the ground standing by.
ghost 117 @ThomasMerrick16, jun 1
Antifa is now in klamath falls Oregon my home town we the people of klamath falls #Patriotsforlife let's get these terrorists out of our town
cory johnson @cjohnsondubai, jun 1
time to lock and load to protect our home. two buses of antifa showed up in klamath falls and with in an hour the citizens were on the street heavily armed.
pacificriver @pacificedge541, jun 1
3 buses of BLM/antifa dropped off in klamath falls oregon. residents out too protect thier town.
i climbed a small hill above the pond at sixtieth street. i looked in vain for the monsters or the buses that reportedly had brought them.
it was later found that they were killed by the disinfecting agents against which their systems were unprepared. slain, after all man's defenses had failed, by the two humblest things that god in his wisdom put upon this earth: time ... and the cold hard light of reality.
(apologies to h.g. wells)
[nbc news]
in klamath falls, oregon, victory declared over antifa, which never showed up
...still others remain convinced that antifa had been there that night, run off by the sight of hundreds of armed patriots.
and that’s the story spreading online.
"antifa retreats from suburb after business owner and neighborhood show up with guns," stated the headline on the website newspunch, one of the internet’s most notorious fake news destinations. the article quotes a facebook post by dan kline, the owner of a local billiards bar.
"i have never felt a threat to my business as i did last night," kline wrote in his post. "antifa didn’t make it to the courthouse and my bar had no incidents. antifa walked into a hornet’s nest. it was like a sixth grade football team walking into the oakland coliseum to take on the raiders."
Wednesday, June 10, 2020
commies from mars
Tuesday, June 02, 2020
the golden age of antifa comics
who can forget these four-color classics from a time when no one declared that anti-fascists were "terrorists" or that tiki-torch-waving nazis were "very fine people" ...
fast forward ...
(see also: "those were the days")
Thursday, January 05, 2012
much more than flesh and blood
prayer war•ri•or |pre(ə)r 'wôrēər|
noun
a person who thinks that sitting at home wishing really really hard for rainbows and ponies and a white christian republican president deserves more honor and respect than those who actually serve, suffer and die on a battlefield.
the most critical people of all are the prayer warriors, IMHO. our battle isn't against flesh and blood, and we're going to need much more than just flesh and blood (or brains and stamina) to stand against that giant.
Monday, July 12, 2010
shoulda, woulda, coulda
s'funny how what sounded impossible a coupl'a years ago sounds like a slam-dunk today ...
nader: what about the more serious violations of habeas corpus. you know after 9-11 bush rounded up thousands of them, americans, many of them muslim americans or arabic americans and they were thrown in jail without charges, they didn't have lawyers, some of them were pretty mistreated in new york city. you know they were all released eventually. napolitano: correct. nader: is that what you mean also about throwing people in jail without charges violating habeas corpus? napolitano: well that is so obviously a violation of the natural law, the natural right to be brought before a neutral arbiter within moments of the government taking your freedom away from you. and the constitution itself, as the supreme court in the boumediene case pretty much said, wherever the government goes, the constitution goes with it and wherever the constitution goes are the rights of the constitution as a guarantee and habeas corpus cannot be suspended by the president ever. it can only be suspended by the congress in times of rebellion which in read milligan says meaning rebellion of such magnitude that judges can't get into their court houses. that has not happened in american history. so what president bush did with the suspension of habeas corpus, with the whole concept of guantanamo bay, with the whole idea that he could avoid and evade federal laws, treaties, federal judges and the constitution was blatantly unconstitutional and is some cases criminal.
nader: what's the sanction for president bush and vice president cheney? napolitano: there's been no sanction except what history will say about them. nader: what should be the sanctions? napolitano: they should have been indicted. they absolutely should have been indicted for torturing, for spying, for arresting without warrants. i'd like to say they should be indicted for lying but believe it or not, unless you're under oath, lying is not a crime. at least not an indictable crime. it's a moral crime. nader: so you think george w. bush and dick cheney should even though they've left office, they haven't escaped the criminal laws, they should be indicted and prosecuted? napolitano: the evidence in this book and in others, our colleague the great vincent bugliosi has amassed an incredible amount of evidence. the purpose of this book was not to amass that evidence but i do discuss it, is overwhelming when you compare it to the level of evidence required for a normal indictment that george w. bush as president and dick cheney as vice president participated in criminal conspiracies to violate the federal law and the guaranteed civil liberties of hundreds, maybe thousands of human beings. (hat tip to crooks and liars)
Thursday, July 01, 2010
the hammer
when you have a hammer, people will bring you nails:
what’s the point of you saving this superb military for, colin, if we can't use it? — former un ambassador madeleine albright
Friday, December 25, 2009
how, indeed ...
nineteen years later and i'm still scratchin' my head. of course, the premise might be a tad flawed ...
(art by bill watterson)
Tuesday, December 08, 2009
kobayashi morituri
the rest of task force 141 brought in the ACS, allen. two men took down an entire base. i ask much more from you now. yesterday you were a soldier on the front lines, but today, front lines are history. uniforms are relics. the war rages everywhere and there will be casualties.
this man makarov is fighting his own war and he has no rules, no boundaries. he doesn't flinch at torture, human trafficking or genocide. he's not loyal to a flag or country or any set of ideals. he trades blood for money.
he's your new best friend.
you don't wanna know what it's cost already to put you next to him. it will cost you a piece of yourself.
it will cost nothing compared to everything you'll save.
that was your mission commander speaking. you're a covert cia operative inserted into a freelance russian terror group.their plan: kill everyone in a busy moscow airport during broad daylight.
your mission?
for some reason, you're never actually told.
and that's the set-up to the graphic and controversial airport massacre scene in infinity ward's latest first-person shooter call of duty: modern warfare 2.
*** warning: spoiler alert ***
the faint of heart have the option of skipping this mission. those who choose to participate have only two options: to idly watch or to shoot. you may shoot bystanders or you may shoot your teammates.either way, the scene ends the same. you die.
star trek fans will be reminded of the kobayashi maru scenario:
the infamous starfleet academy test challenges the cadet to rescue a defenseless ship under enemy attack. however, despite the superficial similarities, the airport massacre is no kobayashi.that's because your mission is not to save innocent lives and/or to stop the terrorists. you're not there to learn how to conquer fear in a no-win situation. you're not there to stare down death and go out a hero.
your mission is to die, so that your corpse can trigger the next world war.
according to the game's story arc, each of the characters you inhabit is only the unwitting pawn of your mission commander, who is ultimately exposed as a traitor. at the end of the airport massacre, the terrorists leave your corpse as evidence of american treachery, which provokes the new ultranationalist government to launch a massive surprise invasion of the U.S.
so the airport scene was made a no-win situation not as a character-building exercise. it's no-win because the game simply can't move forward without it, even if you are allowed to skip it. and unless you enjoy the methodical, withering, loud and joyless mowing of screaming civilians, you might want to.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
bombs of love™
atrios @ eschaton:
our Very Serious foreign policy community seems to think that "winning" a war involves leaving behind paradise, and then are a bit surprised when our Bombs of Love don't produce that outcome.