Monday, May 21, 2007

um, who's irrelevant ... ?

in a biting rebuke, the white house on sunday dismissed former president jimmy carter as "increasingly irrelevant" after his harsh criticism of president bush.

carter was quoted saturday as saying "i think as far as the adverse impact on the nation around the world, this administration has been the worst in history."

the georgia democrat said bush had overseen an "overt reversal of america's basic values" as expressed by previous administrations, including that of his own farther [sic], former president george h.w. bush.

"i think it's sad that president carter's reckless personal criticism is out there," white house spokesman tony fratto responded sunday from crawford, where bush spent the weekend.

"i think it's unfortunate," fratto said. "and i think he is proving to be increasingly irrelevant with these kinds of comments."


jimmy carter, that boorish failure, who can point to little more than a nobel peace prize to his credit, is obviously jealous of the commander-guy.

because yes, even 18 months before george w. bush's triumphal exit from the world stage, his stalwart colleagues have already seated him among the fabled champions of conservative republicanism and are weaving epic paeans to his matchless accompishments and his everlasting fame:


(video courtesy of real time with bill maher)


or ... maybe not.

No comments: