as everyone knows, second to the initial struggle with accepting an identity that conflicts with the mainstream (especially an antagonistic mainstream), is the painful exodus of even longtime friends unwilling to accompany much less support the journey:
i never post on free republic, although i come here everyday, but something has been bothering me and i'm not exactly sure how to handle it.ever since his holiness obama has made his gay marriage proclamation, my facebook feed has been inundated by posts from my gay friends about it.
i haven't responded to any of the posts, because i know it would be go over well. none of my friends responses by others has been anything except positive (from the gay point of view).
i'm smart enough to know that not everyone believes in gay marriage, and the ones who feel as i do just don't want to get involved because they don't feel the hassle is worth it.
my issue is that i'm sick to death reading those idiotic posts day after day. i'm fed up and I WILL respond eventually, but when i do, i want to do so calmly, and in a way where i won't come across as a homophobe. i know when i respond i'll lose at least half my gay friends, which sucks, but that's life i guess.
does anyone have suggestions on how i could respond civily? i tend to think i'll leave religion out of it, because i want to come across rationally, and when religion gets into the mix, rationality goes out the window instantly.
i apologize for the lame post, i'm extremely new at this.
— "sporke"
well, that is a painful dilemma, isn't it?
while i'm sure "sporke" isn't the first homophobe to struggle with coming out of the closet, to those taking their first steps, it often feels that way. but whom better to turn to for rational guidance than the "guns-god-and-country"-loving patriots at the wingnut waterhole free republic?
i must admit to my own struggle just sifting out the gold from this rich vein of wingnut wisdom. the first response pretty much summed up the practical advice:
are they real life friends, or FB friends?if the latter....just unfriend them! no matter WHAT you say...they’ll label you a phobe anyway.
or, say your peace and THEN "unfriend" them.
if the former? they should already know how you feel.
my 2 cents....
— "brad's gramma"
dr. lecter suggests staying in the closet:
anything you say can, and most certainly will, be used against you on facebook. best to leave it be.— "helloooClareece"
unfortunately there is no response they would consider civil. it's there way or the highway.BTW the vast majority of people of all ages highly disapprove of the gay agenda.
this has been repeatedly born out by popular elections.
— "cyberSpartacus"
which BTW explains why there are no openly gay elected officials ...
i'm so glad i came across this post, i have been struggling with this as well. i have been trying to compose a response in my head and couldn't quite figure out how to respond to some posts.after reading what other people have commented, i have decided that they are right and there is nothing you can say that won't make you sound "evil" for disagreeing.
at least we have somewhere to go with like minded people. :-)
— "mrsadams"
it may not be facebook, but sporke's making and helping new friends already!
i have lots of gay friends on facebook and those who vehemently support them. their primary reason for supporting gay marriage is that they hate the dogmatic intolerance of the religious right trying to dictate to them how they should live and what they should believe. in their attempt to sway us away from our beliefs and doctrines for its intolerance, they often display the most hateful,vicious intolerance themselves for those with whom they disagree. the hypocrisy is lost on them. do not trouble yourself to respond.— "erkyl"
we like our intolerance just fine, thank you!
the only reason homosexuality is wrong is because god said so.— "donna"
which, until god changes his mind, should be good enough for everyone!
... you could also point out to your gay friends that they already have the right to marry—everyone does as long as they marry someone of the opposite sex. gay people CHOOSE not to exercise these rights. they aren’t denied anything. they want special privileges. why should two able-bodied gay men who can work their whole lives without ever producing children together get special privileges?— "dupree"
and up to now i thought that this talking point was universally recognized even by wingnuts for the cynical absurdist joke it is. apparently, not everyone is in on it.
i don’t have any "gay" friends, wouldn’t associate with anyone gay, won’t work with anyone gay (that i’m aware of) because my views are well known on the subject and folks know exactly where i stand.— "maddog55"
well, alrighty then — problem solved! forever!
(cross-posted at daily kos)
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
still struggling to come out
Labels:
conservative,
extremism,
free republic,
freepers,
homosexuality,
internet,
religion,
republicans
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
i thought that this talking point was universally recognized even by wingnuts for the cynical absurdist joke it is. apparently, not everyone is in on it.
ReplyDeleteNo, no, it's serious. They mean the universal right to marry somebody you don't want to have sex with. It's this new-fangled style of marrying somebody you do want to have sex with that they object to, and I'm sure they don't like it when straight people do that either354.
What "sporke" overlooks is that conservatives aren't a real minority. Conservatism is a lifestyle choice, You're not born that way, and you can change. You can't tell that someone is conservative by their appearance. Conservatives should stop trying to piggyback on real minorities!
ReplyDelete